FAMILY LAW ATTORNEY AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM EFFINGHAM, EFFINGHAM COUNTY, NEWTON, JASPER COUNTY AND FLORA, CLAY COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ORDERS OF PROTECTION AND DIVORCE CASES, NAMES OF PARTIES FOLLOWING A DIVORCE, ESTATE PLANNING WHILE A DIVORCE CASE IS PENDING, WHAT SHOULD PARTIES DO IN THE COURSE OF A MARRIAGE, IN THE EVENT THEY DETERMINE ANY PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT MAY BE UNENFORCEABLE OR INVALID PRIOR TO A DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE PROCEEDING?, STOCK OPTIONS CONSIDERED AS ADDITIONAL INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF REDETERMINATION OF CHILD SUPPORT AFTER A JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
WE HAVE DECADES OF EXPERIENCE REPRESENTING PARTIES IN A WIDE VARIETY OF FAMILY LAW MATTERS INCLUDING WAYS TO CHALLENGE PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS IN DIVORCE CASES, DIVIDING WEDDING GIFTS IN A DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE PROCEEDING, INNOCENT SPOUSE FOR TAX PURPOSES IN A DIVORCE PROCEEDING, FOR PURPOSES OF A DIVORCE, AFTER A MARRIAGE, IS IT BETTER TO TRANSFER THE NON-MARITAL HOME TO BOTH PARTIES TO BE HELD AS JOINT TENANTS OR SHOULD ESTATE PLANNING DOCUMENTS BE UTILIZED INSTEAD?, WHEN ARE THE PARTIES DIVORCED, OR WHEN IS THE DIVORCE FINAL? AND OTHER MATTERS
Blake Behme Gilbreth Links, P.C.
Related Posts
METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS, WILL CONTESTS IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ESTATE LITIGATION LAW FIRM, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – O’FALLON (ST. CLAIR COUNTY), ILLINOIS, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – COULTERVILLE (RANDOLPH COUNTY), ILLINOIS, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM PETERSBURG, MENARD COUNTY, LINCOLN, LOGAN COUNTY, CLINTON, DE WITT COUNTY, ILLINOIS. We have decades of experience in regard to will contests, trust disputes, estate litigation, probate claims, and related cases.- WIFE RECEIVES IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00 IN DIVORCE CASE AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM COBDEN, UNION COUNTY, VIENNA, JOHNSON COUNTY, GOLCONDA, POPE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A DIVORCE CASE WHERE THE WIFE RECEIVED IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00. THE PARTIES HAD BEEN MARRIED FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS AND THE HUSBAND HAD EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS WITH SEVERAL WOMEN. HIS WIFE HAD ENOUGH OF IT. THE JUDGE TOOK THE POSITION THAT THE HUSBAND BASICALLY MANIPULATED INFORMATION AND TESTIMONY IN HIS BEST INTERESTS AND THAT HE LACKED CREDIBILITY. THE WIFE COULD HAVE SETTLED FOR LESS. HOWEVER, BY PROCEEDING WITH THE MATTER THROUGH TRIAL, THE WIFE ENDED UP WITH A SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER RESULT THAT HAD BEEN OFFERED BY THE HUSBAND, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM HANDLING ESTATE LAW, FAMILY LAW, REAL ESTATE LAW AND TAX LAW CASES.
- EDWARDSVILLE, ILLINOIS DCFS (DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES) AND ORDERS OF PROTECTION LAWYERS, MADISON COUNTY
- CLIENTS SEEKING OUT OF TOWN OR OUT-OF-THE-AREA REPRESENTATION, INCLUDING TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN REGARD TO REAL ESTATE BUSINESS LAW, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS REAL ESTATE LAW FIRM, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM MACOMB, MCDONOUGH COUNTY, CANTON, FULTON COUNTY, HAVANA, MASON COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
- CLIENTS SEEKING OUT OF TOWN OR OUT OF THE AREA REPRESENTATION INCLUDING TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN REGARD TO GUARDIANSHIP AND REAL ESTATE LAW, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS REAL ESTATE LAW FIRM, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM CAIRO, ALEXANDER COUNTY, MOUNDS, PULASKI COUNTY, METROPOLIS, MASSAC COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
- ILLINOIS TIMESHARE CANCELLATION REPRESENTATION, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM FORD COUNTY, GIBSON CITY, PAXTON, PIPER CITY, ILLINOIS (1) INITIAL NO CHARGE PHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULED WITH POTENTIAL CLIENT (2) DISCUSSION OF FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF A PARTICULAR TIMESHARE CASE AND CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR CANCELLATION AND REPRESENTATION (3) INITIAL DEMAND LETTER TO TIMESHARE ENTITY WITHOUT FILING A SUIT TO ATTEMPT TO REACH A SETTLEMENT (4) IF A SETTLEMENT IS NOT REACH, DEPENDING ON FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, POSSIBLY PROCEEDING TO FILE SUIT BUT CONTINUING WITH SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS AFTER ANY SUIT IS FILED (5) IN THE EVENT OF SETTLEMENT PRIOR TO OR AFTER SUIT BEING FILED INCLUDING PURSUANT TO ANY SETTLEMENT APPROVED BY CLIENT THEN DISMISSAL OF ANY SUIT AND A MUTUAL RELEASE BETWEEN THE PARTIES FOR FINAL CONCLUSION OF MATTERS, INCLUDING SO THAT NO FURTHER TIMESHARE PAYMENTS WOULD BE OWED AND THERE WOULD NOT BE A CLAIM FILED AGAINST THE ESTATE OR ANY HEIRS OR BENEFICIARIES AT A LATER DATE.
