METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDER OF PROTECTION EXPERIENCED LAW FIRM, ORDER OF PROTECTION APPROVED AGAINST ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY HUSBAND! WE WERE RETAINED FOR REPRESENTATION BY THE FORMER SPOUSE OF AN ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY PRACTICING IN SOUTHERN ILLINOIS. WE THOUGHT OUR CLIENT HAD AN EXCELLENT CASE. WE RESEARCHED THE MATTER THOROUGHLY, INCLUDING CONSIDERING PHONOGRAPHS IN PREPARATION FOR THE HEARING. AFTER THE CASE WAS CALLED, THE FORMER HUSBAND OF OUR CLIENT, WHO WAS A PRACTICING ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY, AGREED TO SETTLE AND WE WON EXACTLY WHAT WE WERE SEEKING. THAT IS, A ONE YEAR ORDER OF PROTECTION IN FAVOR OF OUR CLIENT. IT WAS A FANTASTIC RESULT. IF THE ORDER OF PROTECTION IS VIOLATED, WE ARE IN A POSITION TO IMMEDIATELY REQUEST APPROPRIATE RELIEF AND SEVERE SANCTIONS, INCLUDING INCARCERATION, IF NOT OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST THE ASSISTANT STATE’S ATTORNEY THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY MARRIED TO OUR CLIENT, METRO EAST, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM CARLINVILLE, MACOUPIN COUNTY, LITCHFIELD, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, VANDALIA, FAYETTE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
In regard to “OPs” or “Order of Protection”, we have decades of experience representing petitioners and respondents. Some of these cases involve dissolution of marriage, no-stalking orders and other relief.
Related Posts
METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS, WILL CONTESTS IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ESTATE LITIGATION LAW FIRM, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – O’FALLON (ST. CLAIR COUNTY), ILLINOIS, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – COULTERVILLE (RANDOLPH COUNTY), ILLINOIS, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM PETERSBURG, MENARD COUNTY, LINCOLN, LOGAN COUNTY, CLINTON, DE WITT COUNTY, ILLINOIS. We have decades of experience in regard to will contests, trust disputes, estate litigation, probate claims, and related cases.- WIFE RECEIVES IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00 IN DIVORCE CASE AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM COBDEN, UNION COUNTY, VIENNA, JOHNSON COUNTY, GOLCONDA, POPE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A DIVORCE CASE WHERE THE WIFE RECEIVED IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00. THE PARTIES HAD BEEN MARRIED FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS AND THE HUSBAND HAD EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS WITH SEVERAL WOMEN. HIS WIFE HAD ENOUGH OF IT. THE JUDGE TOOK THE POSITION THAT THE HUSBAND BASICALLY MANIPULATED INFORMATION AND TESTIMONY IN HIS BEST INTERESTS AND THAT HE LACKED CREDIBILITY. THE WIFE COULD HAVE SETTLED FOR LESS. HOWEVER, BY PROCEEDING WITH THE MATTER THROUGH TRIAL, THE WIFE ENDED UP WITH A SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER RESULT THAT HAD BEEN OFFERED BY THE HUSBAND, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM HANDLING ESTATE LAW, FAMILY LAW, REAL ESTATE LAW AND TAX LAW CASES.
- EDWARDSVILLE, ILLINOIS DCFS (DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES) AND ORDERS OF PROTECTION LAWYERS, MADISON COUNTY
- CLIENTS SEEKING OUT OF TOWN OR OUT-OF-THE-AREA REPRESENTATION, INCLUDING TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN REGARD TO REAL ESTATE BUSINESS LAW, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS REAL ESTATE LAW FIRM, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM MACOMB, MCDONOUGH COUNTY, CANTON, FULTON COUNTY, HAVANA, MASON COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
- CLIENTS SEEKING OUT OF TOWN OR OUT OF THE AREA REPRESENTATION INCLUDING TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN REGARD TO GUARDIANSHIP AND REAL ESTATE LAW, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS REAL ESTATE LAW FIRM, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM CAIRO, ALEXANDER COUNTY, MOUNDS, PULASKI COUNTY, METROPOLIS, MASSAC COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
- ILLINOIS TIMESHARE CANCELLATION REPRESENTATION, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM FORD COUNTY, GIBSON CITY, PAXTON, PIPER CITY, ILLINOIS (1) INITIAL NO CHARGE PHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULED WITH POTENTIAL CLIENT (2) DISCUSSION OF FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF A PARTICULAR TIMESHARE CASE AND CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR CANCELLATION AND REPRESENTATION (3) INITIAL DEMAND LETTER TO TIMESHARE ENTITY WITHOUT FILING A SUIT TO ATTEMPT TO REACH A SETTLEMENT (4) IF A SETTLEMENT IS NOT REACH, DEPENDING ON FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, POSSIBLY PROCEEDING TO FILE SUIT BUT CONTINUING WITH SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS AFTER ANY SUIT IS FILED (5) IN THE EVENT OF SETTLEMENT PRIOR TO OR AFTER SUIT BEING FILED INCLUDING PURSUANT TO ANY SETTLEMENT APPROVED BY CLIENT THEN DISMISSAL OF ANY SUIT AND A MUTUAL RELEASE BETWEEN THE PARTIES FOR FINAL CONCLUSION OF MATTERS, INCLUDING SO THAT NO FURTHER TIMESHARE PAYMENTS WOULD BE OWED AND THERE WOULD NOT BE A CLAIM FILED AGAINST THE ESTATE OR ANY HEIRS OR BENEFICIARIES AT A LATER DATE.
