REAL ESTATE LAW FIRM PROVIDING REPRESENTATION IN REGARD TO ITEMS NOT DISCLOSED BY SELLERS PRIOR TO CLOSING OR DISCOVERED BY PURCHASERS AFTER CLOSING. WE ARE OFTEN CONTACTED BY CLIENTS COMPLAINING THAT THEY HAVE BEEN TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF BY SELLERS, REALTORS OR HOME INSPECTORS IN REGARD TO TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE. METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS REAL ESTATE LAW FIRM HANDLING REAL ESTATE MATTERS, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM EFFINGHAM, EFFINGHAM COUNTY, NEWTON, JASPER COUNTY, FLORA, CLAY COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
We have decades of experience providing representation to buyers and sellers, including after closing, such as in regard to complaints that there were defects that were not timely disclosed, that the seller hid certain conditions, that the home inspector performed in an unworkman-like manner, that realtors did not protect the parties, that there were issues with the title company, and that no one will do anything about it.
Related Posts
METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS, WILL CONTESTS IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ESTATE LITIGATION LAW FIRM, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – O’FALLON (ST. CLAIR COUNTY), ILLINOIS, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – COULTERVILLE (RANDOLPH COUNTY), ILLINOIS, (CONFIDENTIAL) ESTATE – ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM PETERSBURG, MENARD COUNTY, LINCOLN, LOGAN COUNTY, CLINTON, DE WITT COUNTY, ILLINOIS. We have decades of experience in regard to will contests, trust disputes, estate litigation, probate claims, and related cases.- WIFE RECEIVES IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00 IN DIVORCE CASE AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM COBDEN, UNION COUNTY, VIENNA, JOHNSON COUNTY, GOLCONDA, POPE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A DIVORCE CASE WHERE THE WIFE RECEIVED IN EXCESS OF $3,000,000.00. THE PARTIES HAD BEEN MARRIED FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS AND THE HUSBAND HAD EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS WITH SEVERAL WOMEN. HIS WIFE HAD ENOUGH OF IT. THE JUDGE TOOK THE POSITION THAT THE HUSBAND BASICALLY MANIPULATED INFORMATION AND TESTIMONY IN HIS BEST INTERESTS AND THAT HE LACKED CREDIBILITY. THE WIFE COULD HAVE SETTLED FOR LESS. HOWEVER, BY PROCEEDING WITH THE MATTER THROUGH TRIAL, THE WIFE ENDED UP WITH A SUBSTANTIALLY BETTER RESULT THAT HAD BEEN OFFERED BY THE HUSBAND, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS LAW FIRM HANDLING ESTATE LAW, FAMILY LAW, REAL ESTATE LAW AND TAX LAW CASES.
- EDWARDSVILLE, ILLINOIS DCFS (DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES) AND ORDERS OF PROTECTION LAWYERS, MADISON COUNTY
- CLIENTS SEEKING OUT OF TOWN OR OUT-OF-THE-AREA REPRESENTATION, INCLUDING TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN REGARD TO REAL ESTATE BUSINESS LAW, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS REAL ESTATE LAW FIRM, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM MACOMB, MCDONOUGH COUNTY, CANTON, FULTON COUNTY, HAVANA, MASON COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
- CLIENTS SEEKING OUT OF TOWN OR OUT OF THE AREA REPRESENTATION INCLUDING TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST OR THE APPEARANCE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN REGARD TO GUARDIANSHIP AND REAL ESTATE LAW, METRO EAST, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS REAL ESTATE LAW FIRM, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM CAIRO, ALEXANDER COUNTY, MOUNDS, PULASKI COUNTY, METROPOLIS, MASSAC COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
- ILLINOIS TIMESHARE CANCELLATION REPRESENTATION, AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM FORD COUNTY, GIBSON CITY, PAXTON, PIPER CITY, ILLINOIS (1) INITIAL NO CHARGE PHONE CONFERENCE SCHEDULED WITH POTENTIAL CLIENT (2) DISCUSSION OF FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF A PARTICULAR TIMESHARE CASE AND CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR CANCELLATION AND REPRESENTATION (3) INITIAL DEMAND LETTER TO TIMESHARE ENTITY WITHOUT FILING A SUIT TO ATTEMPT TO REACH A SETTLEMENT (4) IF A SETTLEMENT IS NOT REACH, DEPENDING ON FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, POSSIBLY PROCEEDING TO FILE SUIT BUT CONTINUING WITH SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS AFTER ANY SUIT IS FILED (5) IN THE EVENT OF SETTLEMENT PRIOR TO OR AFTER SUIT BEING FILED INCLUDING PURSUANT TO ANY SETTLEMENT APPROVED BY CLIENT THEN DISMISSAL OF ANY SUIT AND A MUTUAL RELEASE BETWEEN THE PARTIES FOR FINAL CONCLUSION OF MATTERS, INCLUDING SO THAT NO FURTHER TIMESHARE PAYMENTS WOULD BE OWED AND THERE WOULD NOT BE A CLAIM FILED AGAINST THE ESTATE OR ANY HEIRS OR BENEFICIARIES AT A LATER DATE.
