CONTESTED GUARDIANSHIP LAW FIRM, DISPUTES WITH GUARDIAN AD LITEM REPORTS, CONTROVERSIES INVOLVING FIDUCIARY DUTIES, POWER OF ATTORNEYS AND GUARDIANSHIP LITIGATION, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, LAW FIRM WITH MORE THAN FORTY (40) YEARS EXPERIENCE HANDLING A WIDE VARIETY OF GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON, GUARDIANSHIP OF THE ESTATE, GUARDIANSHIP OF MINORS, GUARDIANSHIP OF DISABLED ADULTS, ISSUES INVOLVING GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SECOND OPINION LAW FIRM, MODIFICATION OF GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS, ISSUES WITH TRUST COMPANIES ACTING AS GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE WHILE INDIVIDUALS ARE ACTING AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON, DISPUTES WITH CORPORATE FIDUCIARIES. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A GUARDIANSHIP CASE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH A PHYSICIAN’S REPORT WAS SUBMITTED TO SHOW A GUARDIANSHIP WAS REQUIRED. WE SUBPOENAED THE PHYSICIAN’S RECORDS AND WERE ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT EXAMINE THE ALLEGED DISABLED WARD BUT HAD HIS STAFF FILL IN BLANKS ON A FORM FROM A DIFFERENT PATIENT AND THEN THAT FORM WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AS THOUGH THERE HAD ACTUALLY BEEN AN EXAMINATION OF THE ALLEGED DISABLED ADULT. AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM WARREN COUNTY, MONMOUTH, ROSEVILLE AND KIRKWOOD, PEORIA COUNTY, PEORIA, PEORIA HEIGHTS AND CHILLICOTHE, WOODFORD COUNTY, EUREKA, EL PASO AND MINONK, ILLINOIS.

CONTESTED GUARDIANSHIP LAW FIRM, DISPUTES WITH GUARDIAN AD LITEM REPORTS, CONTROVERSIES INVOLVING FIDUCIARY DUTIES, POWER OF ATTORNEYS AND GUARDIANSHIP LITIGATION, BELLEVILLE, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, LAW FIRM WITH MORE THAN FORTY (40) YEARS EXPERIENCE HANDLING A WIDE VARIETY OF GUARDIANSHIP OF THE PERSON, GUARDIANSHIP OF THE ESTATE, GUARDIANSHIP OF MINORS, GUARDIANSHIP OF DISABLED ADULTS, ISSUES INVOLVING GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SECOND OPINION LAW FIRM, MODIFICATION OF GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS, ISSUES WITH TRUST COMPANIES ACTING AS GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE WHILE INDIVIDUALS ARE ACTING AS GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON, DISPUTES WITH CORPORATE FIDUCIARIES. WE WERE INVOLVED IN A GUARDIANSHIP CASE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH A PHYSICIAN’S REPORT WAS SUBMITTED TO SHOW A GUARDIANSHIP WAS REQUIRED. WE SUBPOENAED THE PHYSICIAN’S RECORDS AND WERE ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT EXAMINE THE ALLEGED DISABLED WARD BUT HAD HIS STAFF FILL IN BLANKS ON A FORM FROM A DIFFERENT PATIENT AND THEN THAT FORM WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT AS THOUGH THERE HAD ACTUALLY BEEN AN EXAMINATION OF THE ALLEGED DISABLED ADULT. AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT CLIENTS FROM WARREN COUNTY, MONMOUTH, ROSEVILLE AND KIRKWOOD, PEORIA COUNTY, PEORIA, PEORIA HEIGHTS AND CHILLICOTHE, WOODFORD COUNTY, EUREKA, EL PASO AND MINONK, ILLINOIS.
We are often hired for representation in regard to guardianship cases. Sometimes we are filing for guardianship for a client. At other times we are contesting for a client a guardianship case that has already been filed. In some situations, client alleges conflicts or potential conflicts of interest. There are often disputes between the appropriateness of acting pursuant to a Power of Attorney or seeking an Order from the Court establishing a guardianship and appointing a guardian. There has to be an investigation as to the appropriateness of any guardianship proceeding and/or Orders entered by the Court. Sometimes it is appropriate to petition the Court to set aside, amend or modify Orders that have been entered in a guardianship proceeding for various reasons. Sometimes circumstances change. In other instances new information is obtained. In some cases, there are changes in the position of the parties or the facts and circumstances relating to the guardianship, the ward and/or any guardians that may have been appointed.
Facebook
Twitter